Read the above article, and this article and you'll see my point:
>>>>>
Scarlett Johansson will be spending the weekend with The Prophet having hot sex, it has been rumored.
Responding to a press inquiry, Ms. Johansson's publicist denied that any sort of hot sex was imminent.
The Prophet has long wanted to have hot sex with Ms. Johansson.
In response to the reports, a spokesperson for the actress said that "Nothing will be made public until after the hot sex has occurred".
According to sources in Hollywood, Ms. Johansson is on the verge of meeting The Prophet in a sleazy Sunset Strip hotel for a weekend of hot sex. However there is currently no indication in which hotel the hot sex could occur.
<<<
The first and last paragraphs say the same thing--there is a rumor of "X".
The second and next to last paragraphs say that there has been no official verification of "X".
The middle paragraph is a statement of fact.
Plus in the original story the writer uses the word "inclination" improperly, meaning to say "indication".
This is what is known as lazy journalism. If the event never occurs, no big deal since it was reported as a rumor. If it does occur, the source can claim that they "broke the story".